Amis dedicates extensive narrative space to describing Self’s observations of thestreets and the thoughts these observations provoke.As Self walks through the city,hebecomes increasingly aware of the hollowness of his relationships and hisengagement with the world around him.He begins to reflect critically on hisrelationship with Selena,wondering if it was ever truly about love or simply sex andfinancial transactions.Thoughts of consumerism,alienation,and the pervasive powerof money begin to seep into his consciousness,as the city increasingly mirrors hisinternal conflicts.In one of his reflections,he considers the existential crisis thatemerges from living in a world where everything,including human interactions,iscommodified.“Now that I no longer go to work every day....and why should peopledo this?Who says?Why wasn’t I consulted?
Conclusion
Frequently criticised by the British media for his apparent affinity for America,atheme vividly embodied in the transatlantic narrative of his bestselling novel Money:A Suicide Note,Martin Amis captures with striking precision the cultural complexitiesof both Britain and the United States.His personal experiences in America haveprofoundly shaped his nuanced portrayal of these cultures,allowing him to depicttheir respective contradictions vividly and critically.Initially captivated by NewYork’s exhilarating urban spectacle when visiting alone,Amis’s perspective shifteddramatically during later visits with his family,when he was confronted with thecity’s indifference and hostility.His disillusionment intensified at Cape Cod,where anentrepreneurial healthcare system prioritising profit over care amplified his critique ofthe American Dream,revealing it as potentially nightmarish during personal crises.He recognised that for ordinary Americans,financial pressures often exacerbatedhardships,converting mere misfortune into catastrophic events.
These personal reflections resonate deeply within Money,where New York andLondon symbolise two distinct but intertwined aspects of modernity.New York,marked by sensory overload and consumerist spectacles,appears as an illusory utopiadriven by capitalist fantasies,captivating yet ultimately deceptive.In contrast,London’s depiction,characterised by postcolonial melancholy and existential unrest,reflects cultural erosion beneath superficial prosperity.As urban spectacles,these twocities generate constant sensory shocks,marked by contingency,transience,andfugitiveness—forces that fragment lived experience and provoke emotional numbnessand isolation.
reference(omitted)
